Definition of a Laboratory Experience
"Laboratory experiences provide opportunities for students to interact
directly with the material world (or with data drawn from the material world),
using the tools, data collection techniques, models, and theories of science."
This definition forms the critical basis for all of the goals specified in
America's Lab Report according to Prof. Susan Singer, the lead author of
the report. All data from science labs must originate in the material world.
That definition does not provide for data that originates from a programmer's
pencil: simulations.
Simulations can have pedagogical value, but this value does not include
substituting for true laboratory experience no matter how well designed or
well integrated the simiulation is.
The following examples of online activities meeting the goals of
America's Lab Report all use data the originates in the material
world. In some instances, the online activities have been augmented by
hands-on experiments that provide another dimension of experience to
students.
Scientific Knowledge and Skill Standards
|
1. Enhancing mastery of subject matter
Scientific investigations may enhance student understanding of specific
scientific facts and concepts and of the way in which these facts and concepts
are organized in the scientific disciplines.
1.1 Mastery of Subject Matter
Enhance student understanding of specific scientific facts and concepts and
the way in which these facts and concepts are organized in the scientific
disciplines.
In order to use science lab experiences to aid subject matter mastery,
labs must have supporting material that helps students.
At the upper left, you can see a reduced image of a warm up page.
This page includes a brief description, goals and objectives, and a series
of questions designed so that students begin to think about the topic and,
possibly, to challenge their preconceptions.
At the upper right is the beginning of a post-lab quiz that helps students
to consider the science investigated with the experiments.
Students can review their experimental work and support materials during
this quiz.
The lower image shows the vocabulary and scientist mini-biography taken
from the same Cell Respiration lab.
The vocabulary list links to a hyperlinked list of all words related to
this lab.
Not shown above is the Procedure page, which has additional background
material on this lab, a procedure discussion when warranted, and
information on errors, graphs, apparatus, units, and more.
Also not shown are the fully worked out solutions for all quiz questions
and the Solution Strategy page that explains principles in more detail and
provides some sample worked-out problems.
All of this material creates a greater mastery of the science illustrated
by the experiments being performed by the students.
1.2 Clear Learning Outcomes
Design of lab includes clearly stated learning outcomes.
Every one of these virtual labs has a full activity plan to support teacher and
curriculum writers. The first image above is the header for the plan and
includes the purpose and goals of the lab for use by the teacher.
The second image is taken from an introduction to one of the lab units and
will be seen by both students and teachers.
|
|
2. Developing scientific reasoning
Scientific investigations may promote a student's ability to identify
questions and concepts that guide scientific investigations; to design and
conduct scientific investigations; to develop and revise scientific
explanations and models; to recognize and analyze alternative explanations and
models; and to make and defend a scientific argument. Making a scientific
argument includes such abilities as writing, reviewing information, using
scientific language appropriately, constructing a reasoned argument, and
responding to critical comments.
2.1 Scientific Reasoning
Identify questions and concepts that guide scientific investigations;
develop and revise scientific explanations and models; recognize and analyze
alternative explanations and models; and make and defend a scientific argument.
Scientific reasoning covers many areas of the science lab experience.
In the beginning, as indicated in the top image above in the blue region,
students should decide on a specific question they're investigating.
Here, they decide to find out whether increasing weight also increases
friction. They then run experiments that attempt to refute this
prediction.
After the experiments are complete, they review their data.
The bottom left image above shows data from one experiment displayed in
three different formats so that comparisons are more readily made.
Students can copy and paste these into other programs. For example,
they might wish to do additional analysis on the data and can copy and
paste the data table into a spreadsheet.
The bottom right image above shows the last portion of an example
lab report format. Here, students are requested to explain their data and
discuss the results including graphs and error analysis. They also must
defend their conclusions.
2.2 Reflection & Discussion
Defending conclusions based on data and analysis of data; comparing results
with other sources and explaining differences.
Most science labs provide little opportunity for reflection and discussion.
These activities are left to the instructor.
Few, if any, virtual labs directly support these goals.
Smart Science® lab units support these goals by retaining student data and
other work for very long times in a database and by explicitly
requesting students to explore outside data sources in Further Explorations
for many lab units.
They also explicitly require students to defend their conclusions in the online
Lab Report.
|
|
3. Understanding the complexity and ambiguity of empirical work
Interacting with the unconstrained environment of the material world in
scientific investigations may help students concretely understand the inherent
complexity and ambiguity of natural phenomena. Scientific investigations may
help students learn to address the challenges inherent in directly observing
and manipulating the material world, including troubleshooting equipment used
to make observations, understanding measurement error, and interpreting and
aggregating the resulting data.
3.1 Empirical Work, Precision
Students understand the complexity and ambiguity of empirical work;
they take notice of precision issues.
With real experiments, random error is a normal part of the data.
The example on the left is a simple graphing experiment that tracks the motion
of a person walking. Uneven walking motion must create random error.
The right image shows an experiment that tracks the tides over a day.
The rough water worsens precision. The data must have random error that
cannot be eliminated through careful data collection.
Of course, sloppy data collection can inject random error into any
experiment.
3.2 Empirical Work, Accuracy
Students understand the complexity and ambiguity of empirical work;
they take notice of accuracy issues.
Even with a simple experiment such as a falling object, accuracy depends
on the calibration. Above left, the vertical scale must translate image
pixels into meters. Due to the camera position, this scale factor varies
over the course of the object's fall. Also, the scale value depends on a
prior calibration step that may be inaccurate.
Above right is an experiment in photosynthesis.
Even though the measurements made with a spectrometer are good, the
experiment's quality also depends on several factors including the
quality of red, green, and blue color filters and on the ability of
a light meter to determine intensity accurately for different colors.
In this lab, the green filter allows enough adjacent colors through to
cause more photosynthesis than textbooks suggest. Students are given
some clues and must account for the discrepancy.
Using LED light sources would eliminate one of the sources of systematic
error.
3.3 Empirical Work, Bad Data
Students take notice of serious experimental errors.
The lab data on the left shows a normal experiment with a reasonably straight
line fit to transpiration data from the pictured plant cutting. The student
follows the position of the water in the vertical capillary on the right
side of the image. The rate of transpiration remains fairly constant
during the experiment resulting in a straight line.
The lab data on the right illustrates an equipment failure.
The slope is much too high compared to the other experiments, and the
data curves downward instead of having a constant slope.
Students should notice these deviations from expected values.
The most likely cause of faster liquid loss whose rate declines as the
liquid level drops is a leak.
|
|
4. Developing practical skills
In scientific investigations, students may learn to use the tools and
conventions of science. For example, they may develop skills in using
scientific equipment correctly and safely, making observations, taking
measurements, and carrying out well-defined scientific procedures.
4.1 Experimental Design
Writing a description of an approach to solving a problem or undertaking a
scientific investigation.
The two images above on the left show a possible implementation of a
hydraulics experiment and materials being assembled for a freezing point lab.
These are two of many wet labs where students enter the data online and can
upload their own images of their experiments.
The wet lab procedure page provides hints and suggestions on possible
experimental design and encourages students to try their own ideas.
Many hands-on experiments have been blended with online experiments to form
"hybrid" labs that include data from both types of experimentation.
The wet portion provides kinesthetic and design experience.
The online experiments deliver science not available at home or, sometimes,
even in well-equipped classrooms.
The image on the right shows equipment assembled for a hydrate analysis.
The top shows the online apparatus, and the bottom illustrates a possible
set of materials for the at-home portion.
4.2 Making Observations
Students make and record observations of their experiments.
Students observe virtual and do-it-yourself experiments and record their
observations.
The top image has students recording solubility results for a wide variety
of solvents and solutes.
The bottom images show recording observations from a virtual and a
do-it-yourself lab. The students count cells in various stages of
reproduction.
4.3 Taking Measurements
Students learn to use measurement devices and to record data with correct
precision.
Virtual labs can readily provide opportunities for students to take readings
from equipment.
The left example above is taken from a redox titration lab.
Students read the meniscus and enter the reading.
An instructor can check the student response in the lab report data table
for correct accuracy and precision.
The right image above is taken from the Measurement activity and shows
a triple-beam balance that must be read by students.
Students get an indication of whether they have the correct value and
precision.
Other measurement readings include an analog electrical multimeter, a buret,
a meter stick, a spring scale, an analog spectrometer, and so on.
4.4 Carrying Out Procedures
Students learn to read and understand procedures before carrying them out
and to adapt them as required.
Some may object that scientists don't follow procedures.
Actually, they do. Much of a scientist's work is routine and repetitious.
Futhermore, one scientist will follow another's procedure in order to
duplicate the second scientist's work, either to check it or as prelude
to extending it.
The real problem with "cookbook" labs is not that students have a procedure
to follow but that the result is known in advance.
Students can deviate from given procedures if they know what they're doing.
Generally, they should have permission of the instructor to do so for
safety reasons.
The images above show portions of the Procedure page from the
Thin Layer Chromatography hybrid lab's wet lab.
Students are encouraged to consider alternate procedures and are provided with
sufficient instructions to succeed in creating a paper chromatogram.
4.5 Equipment Skills
Students learn to operate laboratory equipment.
While no one disputes the value of getting the "feel" of a piece of equipment,
there is great value in understanding exactly how equipment works before
physically approaching it.
On the other hand, much of the equipment of student laboratories, especially
in grades 6-12, is unlikely to be encountered in the non-academic world.
Even in science laboratories, many of the time-honored pieces of equipment
are now obsolete.
Part of learning to use a piece of equipment is understanding how
it works. Virtual activities can perform this activity very well.
Another part is the safety considerations.
Again, that's not a problem with virtual activities.
Whether it's loading a centrifuge or reading a spectrophotometer,
the online world can deal very well with it.
In chemistry, lab work often consists of using specific pieces of glassware
such as pipets, burets, volumetric flasks, boiling flasks, reflux condensers,
and so on.
A well-designed series of virtual activities can provide students with
all of the knowledge they must have to succeed in the live lab while
using this equipment. Only the "feel" is missing, and that will come
quickly if students understand how to use the glassware and its purpose.
|
|
5. Understanding the nature of science
Scientific investigations may help students to understand the values and
assumptions inherent in the development and interpretation of scientific
knowledge, such as the idea that science is a human endeavor that seeks to
understand the material world and that scientific theories, models, and
explanations change over time on the basis of new evidence.
5.1 Nature of Science
Values and assumptions inherent in the development and interpretation of
scientific knowledge.
Students studying and interpreting data from the material world necessarily
discover that different people may interpret the same data differently.
Each person's preconceptions may affect the final conclusions.
The image on the top left shows balls being dropped from a pier.
Students expect, because of prior instruction, that all balls will fall with
the same acceleration.
This lab illustrates the fallacy of this view.
The image at top right shows a pendulum in the Pendulum and Mass lab.
Students expect that the period will change with mass.
It doesn't, and students learn from trying it out for themselves.
Unlike a simulated lab, students don't have to have faith that
the simulation truly models the material world.
The bottom image shows the Animal Behavior lab. Here, the bugs move to the
0.1 M sodium hydroxide side, against expectations.
Students may try to make the data fit their preconceptions in these
labs. Class discussions or instructor advice should help them to overcome
their errors, and they'll discover that science is not as simple or as "black
and white" as they may have thought.
5.2 Material World Data
Students observe objects and phenomena and collect data from the material
world. Data, objects, and phenomena are not simulated.
Making virtual labs using simulations is quite an easy task.
The equations for many phenomena have been published so that even
a non-scientist programmer can create simulations.
However, simulations produce data created by a programmer's pencil, not the
real world and do not include random error.
Students won't collect data point by point because there's no point.
Limits in the theory aren't encountered.
Students learn that theories and data are precise, a very bad learning
outcome.
The example above is from the Smart Science® Photoelectric Effect lab.
On the left is the apparatus with four ultraviolet LED lights.
On the right is a frame from the data collection video.
The work a student does mimics exactly what they'd do in face-to-face
labs. You can readily program this lab as a simulation, but it won't
have the reality or the uncertainty associated with real world investigations.
Although online real labs take more effort to produce, they do use data from
the material world. As a science lab experience, only material world
objects, data, and pheomena should be used. Because they can be used for
online science lab experiences, they should be.
|
|
6. Cultivating interest in science and interest in learning science
As a result of scientific investigations that make science "come alive,"
students may become interested in learning more about science and see it as
relevant to everyday life.
6.1 Interest in Science
Cultivate interest in science and interest in learning science –
make science "come alive."
If a science lab fulfills all of the other goals, then this one should follow
readily. The two examples shown above illustrate how "alive" science can
become if lab experiences are not limited to routine classroom labs and
artificial simulations.
No one would question the aliveness of the left image taken from a video of
balls falling off of the Manhattan Beach pier, an icon in Southern California.
Similarly, seeing real tides in a bay at Cape Cod, Massachusetts provides
a realistic backdrop to understanding the concepts behind tides that
exceeds any animation in interest.
|
|
7. Development of teamwork skills
Scientific investigations may also promote a student's ability to collaborate
effectively with others in carrying out complex tasks, to share the work of
the task, to assume different roles at different times, and to contribute and
respond to ideas.
7.1 Teamwork
Collaborate effectively with others in carrying out complex tasks,
share the work of the task, contribute and respond to ideas.
Few, if any, virtual labs systems are designed to support teamwork directly.
Many even thwart attempts at providing teamwork.
The Smart Science® system allows students to collaborate in a variety of
ways.
- Discuss choices for hypotheses or predictions before beginning
experimentation (top image).
- Share ideas for equipment design and source for materials in wet
experiments, either stand-alone or hybrid.
- Collaborate on the experiment design, writing a team document that
explains how equipment will be built, data will be collected, and
analysis will be done.
- Share data by using "copy and paste" to provide copies of data to
other students in the same team (second image).
- Combine data and images from several students into a group report that
could be a slide show (e.g. Powerpoint) or a document (e.g. Word).
- Use "copy and paste" to share conclusions or other aspects of the
lab report among the team.
Right now, students can use email and shared documents (e.g. Google Docs)
to work together across large geographical distances.
New features in software can further support these collaboration
mechanisms.
|
|
Curriculum Design and Integration Standards
|
1. Clearly communicated purposes
Effective scientific investigations should have clear learning goals that
guide the design of the experience.
1.1 Goals and objectives are measurable and clearly state what
the participants will know or be able to do at the end of the lab or
investigation
"Effective laboratory experiences have clear learning goals that guide the
design of the experience. Ideally these goals are clearly communicated to
students." ALR, p. 101.
This integration goal is quite similar to the lab experience goal of
"Clear Learning Outcomes" in section B. It expands on the idea, especially
as it applies to the overall curriculum.
The left image shows what students see repeatedly during a lab, and the
right image is from a teacher's activity plan.
|
|
2. Sequenced into the flow of instruction
Scientific investigations should be thoughtfully sequenced into the flow of
classroom science instruction. Instructional units embed scientific
investigations with other activities that build on the scientific
investigations and push students to reflect on and better understand these
experiences.
2.1 Sequence lab into the flow of classroom science instruction
"Effective laboratory experiences are thoughtfully sequenced into the flow of
classroom science instruction. That is, they are explicitly linked to what
has come before and what will come after." ALR, p. 102.
This integration goal refers more to the curriulum than to the lab experience
itself.
A single set of closely related experiments, a science "lab," must be
integrated with other learning activities in order to have optimal impact
on learning about science.
For a course unit investigating the behavior of pendulums, Smart Science®
labs are provided that look at change in mass, change in length, and change
in swing amplitude separately. These can be sequenced into a basic
curriculum so that students discover each effect.
A more advanced curriculum has access to the Pendulum Investigation lab
where students decide which parameter to investigate and how to
investigate it. Course designers should take care not to provide
the relationship of pendulum period to the length, mass, and amplitude of
the pendulum before students do the labs. Students should not have
been told the ideal equation for the period of a pendulum beforehand.
The images above provide a small sample of the many pendulums that the students
can study. Students may note the decay of amplitude for the cork pendulum bob
compared with the steel and brass ones shown. They also have wood, aluminum,
and brass bobs.
|
|
3. Integrated learning of science concepts and processes
Instructional units intertwine exploration of content with process through
scientific investigations.
3.1 Integrate science content with the processes of science
"...conceptual understanding, scientific reasoning, and practical skills are
three capabilities that are not mutually exclusive. "...integration of content
and process promotes attainment of several goals identified by the committee."
ALR, p. 102.
Science investigations should automatically provide students with both
content and process.
Unfortunately, many "typical" lab experiences simply allow students to
validate as concept already taught and to do so mechanically.
Labs like the one illustrated above, provide students with the opportunity
to confront the realities of scientific investigation and to understand
the processes of science while learning content first-hand.
The white plus marks are data points chosen interactively by the student.
No data are precollected or precalculated.
Proper use of scientific investigation in instruction uses process to
access content.
|
|
4. Ongoing discussion and reflection
Instruction includes discussing scientific investigations and reflecting on
the meaning they can make from them. Scientific investigations and the
surrounding instructional activities include developing explanations to make
sense of patterns of data. They encourage students to articulate their
hypotheses about phenomena prior to experimentation and reflect on their
ideas after experimentation.
4.1 Communicating to learn
"Laboratory experiences are more likely to be effective when they focus
students more on discussing the activities they have done during their
laboratory experiences and reflecting on the meaning they can make from them,
than on the laboratory activities themselves. Crucially, the focus of
laboratory experiences and the surrounding instructional activities should not
simply be on confirming presented ideas, but on developing explanations to
make sense of patterns of data." ALR, p. 102.
|
This goal relies on students writing a report on their experiences and
on discussions among groups of students, preferably moderated by their
instructor.
Consequently, a virtual lab system should support these two activities
as much as possible.
The example shown above comes from an online lab report and shows a portion of
the report.
After answering some questions designed to require thinking about
experiments performed, students write about their experiments.
Lab design carefully avoids providing an answer ahead of investigation.
The lab report format allows students to copy and paste data tables, graphs,
and other images into documents such as reports and presentations.
Instructor materials emphasize allowing students to discover for themselves
and to share their ideas with fellow students.
|